Skip to main content

The England one

Ok, come on chap. Be strong and face into the issue.

I posted a full and frank match summary on facebook last night. It read:

"Toss".

Not sure if it is worth expanding on, but since I am sat watching England's feint hopes of staying in the competition fading slowly away (i.e Costa Rica one up on Italy) I may as well use the time efficiently. Where did it all go wrong?

Well. First up was the fact that the two players everyone wanted to see sidelined, were in fact not sidelined. Suarez and Rooney. From the outset, it was clear that Uruguay would not be the off-colour outfit that they were in their opener. By contrast, England started nervously and had little rhythm. Rooney, looked off the pace (I should add that I was, and still am utterly torn, as to whether we'd be better without him in the team - but for the sake of not repeating the same errors in every tournament I ever watch, I'd side with the "if it is broken, fix it" camp.) Uruguay started making chances and of course, with complete inevitability, Suarez gave them the lead.

At this point England looked easily second best. Gerrard and Henderson were marshalling an area of the pitch where there was no threat, and Rooney looked just like a brit abroad. A bit hot, dehydrated and generally out of shape. Yet they were taking up shirts that Lallana, Barkely, Lampard must have been begging to fill.

Things improved in the second half, and when Barkely eventually did get onto the pitch, it seemed to perk Rooney up - with several impressive runs before his historic equaliser. At this point, we probably all felt we could turn it around, but Suarez had other ideas, capitalising on Gerrards captaincy-resignation-gesture of a header and walloping home before commencing a celebration / mental & emotional breakdown that lasted for so long that it hadn't finished until long after he was substituted and the match had ended. It was an object lesson in making a team accomplishment all about himself.

So where are we now. Staring down the barrel of a Spain-esque capitulation from the tournament. As I write, the clock is ticking down to just 14 minutes of our [competetive] tournament remaining. Even if Italy turn things around and grab an England saving win, I am in grave doubt about whether England could get the win they'd need AND rely on Suarez not having a second helping of England slaying  in a few days. And even if all that did happen, it would feel a bit wrong. There should be a rule that all teams losing their opening two games must be eliminated. To progress on just 3 points would be a farce.

As my wife astutely pointed out (after about 35 minutes of the match), watching England was confusingly similar to watching Villa. You knew, just knew that it wasn't going to go well - and the 90 minutes was just an exercise in finding out exactly how the inevitable would unfold.

A footnote to all this bitter rambling is that I love the tournament just as dearly without England - and once the dust has settled I will do just that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Azteca

 Well, this one has crept up on me hard! I've barely had time to recover from Villa's Europa League win a fortnight ago; distracted all the while with SkySports trying to sell off our squad to The Big Six and reading stories of the thunderstorms and the visa complexities facing fans, players and referees of countries that Trump doesn't like today - and yet now here we are, listening to Gary Neville self reflecting on his own career as a scene setter for the World Cup. This one is a weird one. The expanded format and cruel time-zone scheduling mean that I go into it with no ambitions to 'watch it all'. The group stages are, on paper, almost devoid of any real jeopardy. The bloating of the tournament means there are now more groups than realistic winners, and with that, of course, no groups of death. And to cater for the stupid total number of teams which has to be 8,16,32 or even 64 dammit - just no other actual number; we have the awful spectacle of most  3rd place ...

Geography lessons

 I'm writing this as Cape Verdi's masterplan is 9 minutes in, versus the mighty (but missing some players) Spain. They are the second nation (after Curaçao) that I didn't even know was a nation - and I have a degree in geography. So, let me share my learning. Curaçao, a Caribbean island has been a country in its own right since 2010. Prior to that, its the usual depressing story of European colonisation, abandonment (when the Europeans realised it wasn't stacked full of precious metals), reinvigorated interest (slave trade) and finally a degree of independence.  Cape Verdi on the other hand is a country (Island nation off the west coast of Senegal) that is older than I am, so I feel I should know better in their case. Again it has history of being a European colony and is another epicentre of the slave trade.  With this in mind, the needle matches to look out for later in the tourney are Curaçao vs Netherlands and Cape Verdi vs Portugal. After Curaçao's outing last...

One bar of 4G

 I'm back, within close proximity of World Cup telly. For a while (after discovering a remote cidery), there was a chance that I'd miss more of this tournament - but after an unexpected sleep in a field, my camp trip has finished without further incident. The footy gods seemingly smiled upon me, as the one bar of 4G reception, whilst often unable to load a web page, did somehow manage to give me solid BBC sounds audio. And with that, I have largely kept in touch with proceedings.  The biggest challenge has been sleep to be honest. Last night, in a cider-induced fever dream, I managed to take in the first half of Morocco v Brazil, which then spliced itself together with the second half of Scotland v Haiti - which was weird. What was more weird was that in between , I had a dream about Tyrone Mings, on horseback, making a rash challenge that managed to destroy both his own knees and the horses existence. But this is something I should speak to a therapist about, rather than leav...