Skip to main content

Not Tuchel bad

 I'm just off the back of watching two of the worst sides in the tournament (South Africa and Czechia) playing out a 1-1 draw. The result keeps their final round of group games potentially interesting, but in truth, neither team deserves to progress. 

Today's post is really all about England. The handbrake is officially off. What a game and what a performance. After a slightly cagey first half, where we edged ahead and then sat back and then did so again; we came out like lions in the second half. Three of them. Proper full on, high tempo, attacking. Shot raining in, arms swinging aloft to gee up the crowd. It was lovely stuff. Bellingham completely justified the nod he got over Rogers (even from my clearly biased perspective), Kane was good - he seems to have really upped his game, and does that dropping back thing that was such a mess when Rooney did it, but to great effect now that we have pace alongside him. Not just pace, but pace with permission. I have spent much of the last few tournaments lamenting Southgate's caution. We've been sitting on a goldmine of talent for the best part of a decade and only now are we seeing it. Even with Barcelona's Gordon looking a bit like a fan competition winner out on the left, we had enough to overwhelm Croatia. Madueke on the right was sublime, so progressive and direct (I prefer him to Saka) and Bellingham is strong, direct and super talented. Add to them the surging runs of Rice and enthusiasm of O'Reilly and we pose such a threat. 

But our biggest advantage, as we see week in week out in the Premier League, is the embarrassment of riches we have on the bench. Being able to throw on Saka, Rogers, Rashford and Guehi is sweet luxury - and will definitely pay dividends as the tourney progresses. I am assuming that the new format means one more match (round of 32) is required vs normal format - and so a deep squad is going to be critical to mitigate the fatigue and suspension risk that the extra match entails. And with strength everywhere we are in no way weakened by Guehi and Konsa lining up as a CB partnership. Nor with Saka and Rashford starting on our wings, or Rogers or Eze getting a run out at 10. 

I feel very very positive about it all.

After the England game, the tournament entered a 36 hour lull, with all of the games being a bit of a challenge. I drifted off to sleep listening to Panama losing at the death to Ghana and in the ridiculous hours Columbia (without the errant Jhon Duran; how that £71m is looking a good sale) swept aside Uzbekistan which was no surprise whatsoever. Now it is Bosnia and Switzerland, which is no fun on paper, but might be decent. Then Canada v Qatar which only has any relevance because of the host situation. Then a shame to likely miss Mexico v South Korea - that could be tasty. 

Bring on the weekend, when the prospect of offset viewing hours becomes more real.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Azteca

 Well, this one has crept up on me hard! I've barely had time to recover from Villa's Europa League win a fortnight ago; distracted all the while with SkySports trying to sell off our squad to The Big Six and reading stories of the thunderstorms and the visa complexities facing fans, players and referees of countries that Trump doesn't like today - and yet now here we are, listening to Gary Neville self reflecting on his own career as a scene setter for the World Cup. This one is a weird one. The expanded format and cruel time-zone scheduling mean that I go into it with no ambitions to 'watch it all'. The group stages are, on paper, almost devoid of any real jeopardy. The bloating of the tournament means there are now more groups than realistic winners, and with that, of course, no groups of death. And to cater for the stupid total number of teams which has to be 8,16,32 or even 64 dammit - just no other actual number; we have the awful spectacle of most  3rd place ...

I am numb

The England match left me numbed. Unimpressive, uninspired, lacklustre – however the bottle of champagne I enjoyed with the game certainly took the edge off things. It seems that we, along with France and Italy are suffering some horrendous ‘anti-football’ affliction. If the game was less global then we could put it down to ‘a long hard season in the Premier league’ or ‘the difficulty of being motivated for national team games when the premier league pays so well’; but neither is valid. Neither is this jibulabulani ball business. The teams who pass to each other seem not to suffer. Poor selections and poor play has blighted us, and whilst lots of vitriol heads in the direction of Heskey, we’d do well to remember that the main culprits on Friday were Gerrard and Rooney for having zero patience on the ball and terrible control. Lampard wasn’t much better. At least Barry gave us some sort of stable platform to build from. I expect the introductions of Joe Cole and Jermain Defoe or Peter...

The Lalas factor

Famous for having a very ginger goatee in 1994. He also managed LA Galaxy, (yes THE galaxy), before getting fired after winning errrm, nothing. A fine CV in which to impart his wisdom. Welcome to ESPN's premier 'soccer' analyst for the next month here in the US. However, I am particularly excited by this development - a stroke of genius by the programming masterminds - in the space of about an hour, he has given me a month's worth of material..... "well, when you think about it, Bob Bradley has done as much as Fabio Capello in his career" "US to win 2-1 on Saturday, I see England getting out of their group but not sure after that" "but what kind of defensive message does this send to the players - I can't agree" (in response to a scarily great tactical suggestion by John Harkes - yes of Sheff Wed fame - to play Landon Donovan, the US' best player, behind the striker to exploit the fact that neither Lampard or Gerrard will ultimately...